这是在说：丘库埃泽认为，利物浦并没有证明在萨拉赫缺阵时会踢得更好，萨拉赫应该得到尊重。
\n
Clarifying and providing context
I think it’s a good idea to start with a brief clarifying question and offer some immediate value. I can provide an English translation along with a quick overview of Salah’s impact on Liverpool. I won't include any fabricated stats, but I can mention how Liverpool managed without him in the 2023-24 season, like winning the Carabao Cup and how their league performance dipped afterward. I should also ask the user if they want translation, summary, context, or post copy.Offering headline assistance
I should respond by asking how I can help with the headline and provide options like: 1) translating to English, 2) giving a quick context and analysis, 3) comparing Liverpool's performance with and without Salah, 4) drafting a social post, and 5) finding the original source link. I can mention the network may be enabled but that I don't necessarily need to use it. I’ll provide a concise analysis and also present the translation in Chinese with an English translation.
\n
这是在说：丘库埃泽认为，利物浦并没有证明在萨拉赫缺阵时会踢得更好，萨拉赫应该得到尊重。
英文翻译：Chukwueze: Liverpool haven’t shown they are better without Salah; he deserves respect.
\n
简短点评：
- 观点偏理性：利物浦在萨拉赫缺阵时能“顶住”，但不代表“更好”。
- 萨拉赫的进球与牵制是体系上限的重要来源；缺席时球队会更均衡却少了决定性火力。
- 23/24 赛季有阶段性好表现（如杯赛），但长期看并未证明“无萨更强”。
需要我补充数据对比（有/无萨拉赫的胜率与进球效率）、背景来源，还是给你写一段社媒评论文案？
\n